Tian Chua dakwa ada bukti

KUALA LUMPUR: Ahli Parlimen Batu, Tian Chua mendakwa mempunyai bukti sahih berhubung pembabitan isteri kepada seorang menteri kanan dan seorang tokoh korporat berpangkat Tan Sri yang mengirim dana keluar negara secara tidak sah.
Ahli Parlimen pembangkang itu mendakwa, pada Mac tahun lalu, isteri menteri itu mengirim dana sebanyak RM600,000 ke Dubai, manakala antara Jun hingga Ogos tahun lalu, tokoh korporat itu mengirim dana berjumlah RM22.2 juta ke United Kingdom.
Justeru, beliau menggesa Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) menyegerakan siasatan terhadap dua kes itu yang melanggar undang-undang perbankan negara mengikut Seksyen 30(1) (b) dan Seksyen 35 (b), Akta Pengurupan Wang 1998."Mereka perlu menyiasat sumber wang itu jika individu ini memiliki wang secara tidak sah," katanya di lobi Parlimen, semalam.
Tian Chua juga mendakwa, melalui beberapa sumber yang diperolehnya, sejak 2006 sehingga kini, sebanyak 114 kes disiasat Bank Negara yang disyaki melanggar Seksyen 30, Akta Pengurupan Wang 1998.
Katanya, beliau sudah berusaha mendapatkan maklumat lanjut daripada BNM berhubung kes itu, namun tidak mendapat maklum balas.
Beliau menggesa BNM mengumumkan hasil siasatan pemindahan wang RM10 juta ke London oleh seorang menteri besar pada 2008 dan meminta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) menyiasat sumber wang itu.

Anwar vs Dr M: Karpal wants honest judgment

While the apex court heard Anwar Ibrahim's final appeal today after 11 years over his unlawful dismissal as deputy prime minister and finance minister, it was his counsel Karpal Singh who stole the thunder by asking judges at the hearing to be 'honest to themselves and the country'."It is preposterous that the prime minister can dismiss a minister and then inform the Agong...There must be judicial honesty in the courts in this country," the senior lawyer said."Your lordships need to ensure it is so.

The court has this right opportunity to correct what is wrong and do so with this case. There is a glaring mistake by the appellate court and this apex court ought to (intervene) on what was constitutionally wrong (done by the Prime Minister)," Karpal said in ending his submission.The second highest judge in the country Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, who is the Court of Appeal president was leading the panel of three judges hearing the matter.Alauddin on hearing this remark immediately asked Karpal, whether this was all and the senior lawyer said the court should not accept the argument by the government lawyers that the appeal was an abuse of the court process.

"It is an abuse of power (by the prime minister) and hence this appeal should be allowed," Karpal said.The other two judges hearing the appeal were Justice Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusof and Justice Abdul Hamid Embong.Justice Mohd Ghazali was brought in today to replace Justice Hashim Yusoff who had decided to recuse himself as he had heard Anwar's sodomy appeal at the Court of Appeal in 2003.

Anwar's application was struck out by the High Court, without the matter being heard through a full trial. The Court of Appeal has also dismissed his appeal and ruled Anwar's dismissal as lawful.Two questions of lawKarpal at the start of his submission said there are two questions of law which are to considered:•Whether Article 43(5) of the federal constitution specifically requires the Agong to be the authority which revokes the appointment of the deputy prime minister and finance minister, or whether the cabinet has the right to revoke any appointment it makes; and•Whether the deletion of Anwar's name as deputy premier and the substitution of Mahathir's name as finance minister by virtue the Federal Government (Amendment) Order 1998, could in anyway cure the complete absence of the former premier complying with the explicit provision of the said Article 43(5).

Central to the issue of dismissal was the letter that the then-prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad had sent to Anwar on Sept 2, 1998 which stated:"With regret I am forced to dismiss you from the post of the deputy prime minister and finance minister and other related posts. The Agong has been informed over the dismissal."Karpal submitted the dismissal by the prime minister was in contravention of article 43(5) of the constitution, which provided the appointment of any minister may be revoked by the Agong on the advice of the prime minister.

"The appellant (Anwar) in substance contended his appointment could not be effected by the prime minister without prior assent of the Agong," he said.Appellate court misdirectedKarpal also submitted the appellate court judges had misdirected itself seriously when it concluded that while Mahathir's letter did not indicate there was a written command from the Agong, it was sufficient for the first respondent to state he had informed the monarch over the dismissal.Another judge, Karpal added , had also misdirected himself seriously when he stated under the constitution the Agong was a constitutional monarch and the power to dismiss the minister lies with the prime minister."The judgment also stated the prime minister at any time advise the Agong to dismiss a minister and the Agong was bound to such advise," he said."This is contrary to the grain, substance, spirit and clear wording of Article 43 (5)," he said.Clearly, Karpal said, it is the Agong who appoints a minister and it must follow that only the Agong being the appointing authority, could revoke the appointment.

The counsel questioned as to what transpired whether Mahathir had truly advised or merely told the Agong."Is it truly advice or did he merely inform the Agong? This raises questions on the abuse of power by the prime minister," he said.

"I am surprised the High Court and the appellate court chose to ignored this point," submitted Karpal.Kamaluddin: Agong did not object to dismissal Senior federal counsel Kamaluddin Md Said, representing the prime minister and the government, said Parliament records Hansard showed Mahathir informing the Parliament that the king did not object to the dismissal."This in itself is a clear compliance to Article 43(5) that the king had accented and therefore, the requirement under the said article had been met," he said.

Kamaluddin said the High Court and the appellate court were right when they decided that as a constitutional monarch, the king was required to act in accordance with the advice of the cabinet and the prime minister.

"By convention, the head of state must act on the advice by the government. This is similarly practised in Britain," he said."In the circumstances, we urge this court not to disturb the Court of Appeal's decision and dismiss Anwar's appeal."Anwar, who was present at the court today, said he was not expecting to get his posts back but to set the record straight on his sacking.

"It is the Agong who should have revoked my appointment and not the prime minister," he said.Anwar, who was with his wife and PKR president Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, also quipped to reporters, "Were you expecting a decision today?""It (would) never (happen) with a case involving Anwar," he smiled.After hearing submissions today, the Federal Court ruled that it will make a ruling at a later date.

SETIAUSAHA POLITIK MENTERI KANAN DISIASAT SPRM - mStar

Seorang setiausaha politik menteri kanan yang dikatakan telah mengumpul berjuta-juta ringgit dalam masa yang singkat sedang disiasat oleh Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM).Difahamkan, penyiasat kes tersebut pernah mendapat perintah bagi merampas dan membekukan beberapa harta miliknya termasuk kereta mewah dan rumah selain akaun bank yang telah pun dibekukan bagi membantu siasatan di bawah Akta Pencegahan Pengubahan Wang Haram.

Menurut sumber, senarai rampasan harta tersebut termasuklah sekurang-kurangnya empat buah kereta mewah dan empat buah rumah dipercayai kepunyaan setiausaha politik yang berumur lewat 30-an itu.Suruhanjaya tersebut sedang menyiasat pembelian hartanya di kawasan Lembah Klang yang dikatakan diperolehi dari wang sogokan daripada kelulusan beberapa projek yang bernilai jutaan ringgit.

Difahamkan, beberapa rampasan adalah di bawah nama setiausaha politik itu dan penyiasat akan memanggil nama-nama lain yang telah didaftarkan sebagai pemilik. Sumber juga berkata, pegawai penyiasat telah pun mengenal pasti beberapa individu lain yang turut terlibat dengan kes tersebut dan juga akan dipanggil bagi membantu siasatan.

Sebuah pasukan khas daripada suruhanjaya di Putrajaya juga telah pun memulakan siasatan kira-kira tiga minggu lalu berikutan maklumat yang mengatakan dia menjalani kehidupan mewah melebihi kemampuannya.Difahamkan bahawa siasatan terhadap setiausaha politik tersebut dikategorikan antara kes berprofil tinggi.

Sehingga kini, suruhanjaya masih lagi meneruskan siasatan berdasarkan laporan dan maklumat yang telah diberikan oleh orang ramai. Pegawai suruhanjaya enggan mengulas tentang perkara ini ketika dihubungi.

Anwar Kecewa Hakim Tetap Tarikh Perbicaraan Tanpa Menunggu Rayuan Dapatkan Bahan Bukti Daripada Mahkamah Persekutuan !!

KUALA LUMPUR, 2 Dis [6.15 am] - Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menyatakan rasa kesal dengan tindakan hakim menetapkan tarikh perbicaraan walaupun permohonannya mendapatkan bahan bukti untuk menyiapkan pembelaan beliau masih belum diputuskan oleh Mahkamah Persekutuan. “Hakim telah menetapkan perbicaraan dengan membelakangkan sama sekali rayuan kami bersabit perkara ini,” Anwar memberitahu pemberita.

“Beliau seharusnya menghormati keputusan yang dibuat sendiri untuk memberikan kami dokumen berkenaan dan memberi masa kepada Mahkamah Persekutuan memutuskan perkara ini,” tambah Anwar. Mohd Zabidin sebelum ini meluluskan permohonan Anwar untuk mendapatkan dokumen tertentu daripada pendakwaraya selaras dengan peruntukan undang-undang.

Bagaimanapun keputusan itu ditolak oleh Mahkamah Rayuan dan kini dirujuk kepada Mahkamah Persekutuan. Terdahulu, Mahkamah tinggi pagi tadi menolak permohonan Anwar untuk menggugurkan pendakwaan liwat yang dihadapi beliau.

Hakim Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah memutuskan perbicarana Anwar Ibrahim akan bermula pada 25 Januari hingga 25 Februari tahun depan. Mohd Zabidin ketika membuat keputusan berkata hanya melalui perbicaraan penuh maka liwat benar-benar berlaku atau tidak seperti mana yang dituduh oleh pendakwaraya.

Jika Anwar didapati bersalah beliau menghadapi penjara 20 tahun. Anwar berkata, keputusan tersebut menjadikan kes berkenaan sebagai kes pertama dalam sejarah kehakiman yang menyaksikan mahkamah menyebelahi pendakwaan seks dan mengenepikan bukti-bukti perubatan.

“Ini adalah kes yang pertama dalam sejarah di mana mahkamah menyebelahi pendakwaan seks dan mengenepikan bukti-bukti perubatan yang menunjukan tiada kesan liwat," katanya. Sumber TVS

Bayaran tambahan persekolahan

KUALA LUMPUR 2 Dis. - Kementerian Pelajaran akan mengenakan bayaran tambahan kepada pelajar bagi sesi persekolahan tahun depan.Ketua Pengarah Pelajaran, Tan Sri Alimuddin Mohd. Dom berkata, berbeza dengan yuran persekolahan, bayaran tambahan tersebut akan digunakan untuk manfaat para pelajar.

Menurut beliau, yuran persekolahan pula akan digunakan untuk menampung hal ehwal pentadbiran sekolah serta penambahbaikan beberapa kemudahan yang disediakan.Katanya, jumlah bayaran tambahan itu akan diumumkan kelak dan ia boleh dibayar ketika sesi persekolahan bermula."Bayaran tersebut tidak akan membebankan ibu bapa dan para pelajar. Ia juga akan digunakan untuk kemudahan dan aktiviti mereka. Sebagai contoh, duit yuran tambahan itu akan digunakan sebagai insurans dan untuk menjayakan aktiviti kurikulum pelajar sepanjang sesi persekolahan," katanya ketika dihubungi Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.

Beliau diminta mengulas hasil perbincangan Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Penggal Persekolahan 2010 yang dipengerusikan oleh Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin baru-baru ini.

Dalam pada itu, Alimuddin berkata, mesyuarat itu kebiasaannya akan diadakan setiap hujung tahun bagi meneliti persiapan persekolahan serta menangani pelbagai isu yang timbul sebelum bermulanya sesi persekolahan baru.

"Dalam mesyuarat tersebut, apa jua perkara berbangkit seperti infrastruktur, perabot, peralatan dan jumlah guru akan diperbincangkan."Ini bertujuan agar para pelajar dapat mengikuti sesi persekolahan dalam keadaan selesa serta memastikan segala kemudahan yang disediakan berada dalam keadaanbaik," jelasnya.

Sesi persekolahan baru bermula pada 3 dan 4 Januari ini.

ADA MESEJ TANYA SAYA : TERENGGANU APE CERITA BANG ?

Saya jawab :

Terengganu leni cerite banjir la .. cerite monsoon cup .. pemimpin umeno sedang bergalok suke .. rakyat tengoh derite ... bahang di banjir .. rumoh tenggelam di air , atap bocor , sejuk ketor .. pemimpin umeno perut kenyang neting makang sedap-sedap ... rakyat kelaporan , pitis takdok , kerje kerajaang bonus sikit , baju sekoloh anok2 dok beli lagi , yurang sekoloh koho naik ... pemimpin umeno berpesta monsoon cup ... rakyat pesta nangis mengenang nasib ... habis harte bahang di hujan , punoh habis , beras dapur koho sikit , hutang timbung ... pemimpin umeno galok dengan orang putih .. rakyat putih mate ... pemimpin umeno kaya raye ... rakyat pape kedane ... orang kelaut dok leh turun kelaut belake ... ombok kuat , dapur dok berasap .. pemimpin umeno bahang untung .. rakyat kelopong ... pemimpin umeno bahang sedap .. rakyat habis terap .. pemimpin umeno senang lenang ... rakyat tunggang langgang ..

PAKAT TURUN SOKONG TGNA !!!!!!!!